Brevo vs Mailchimp: Which Is Better in 2026? (Honest Comparison)
Brevo vs Mailchimp compared for 2026 — pricing, deliverability, automation, ease of use, and support. Find out
Email Threat Intelligence monitors how your domain is being weaponised in the wild — phishing campaigns, spoofing attacks, lookalike domains, and business email compromise attempts targeting your customers, partners, and employees. Real-time alerts give you the window to act before damage is done.
Attackers do not need access to your email infrastructure to send email as your domain. They just need to know your domain name. Email Threat Intelligence monitors the public email ecosystem for evidence that your domain, brand, or executive names are being used in attacks — and alerts you before your customers, partners, or employees are harmed.
Monitor DMARC forensic reports, SMTP trap networks, and third-party threat intelligence feeds for emails sent using your exact domain in the From: address without authentication. Every spoofed email using yourbrand.com is logged with source IP, recipient address, subject line, and timestamp — giving you a complete picture of active spoofing campaigns.
Attackers often register domains that look like yours — yourbr4nd.com, migomai1.com, yourbrand-secure.com, yourbrand.net — to send phishing emails that bypass DMARC (since they are different domains). Migomail monitors newly registered domains globally for variations of your brand name using typosquatting algorithms, homograph detection, and TLD permutation scanning.
Business email compromise attacks frequently use your executive names in the display name field while sending from a different address — "John Smith, CEO
Detect active phishing campaigns using your brand — landing pages impersonating your login portal, credential harvesting forms using your logo, SMS phishing (smishing) messages impersonating your company, and email campaigns targeting your customer base using your brand assets.
Every detected threat event triggers an alert within 5 minutes — delivered via email, Slack, or webhook to your security team. Alerts are pre-classified by attack type and severity, with the specific evidence (detected domain, attack method, target population, estimated campaign scope) included in the notification body.
Weekly threat intelligence digest showing all detected threats against your domain, trend data (are attacks increasing or decreasing), new lookalike domains registered, executive targeting patterns, and comparative data showing how your exposure compares to industry peers. Monthly executive briefing format available for board and CISO reporting.
When a lookalike domain or phishing page is confirmed, Migomail provides takedown request templates for ICANN registrar abuse reports, hosting provider abuse contact information, and coordination with threat intelligence sharing communities (ISACs) to accelerate the takedown process. Takedown status is tracked in the dashboard.
Email Threat Intelligence is most powerful when combined with Hosted DMARC. DMARC forensic reports feed directly into the threat intelligence layer — so the same attack that appears in your DMARC forensic data is automatically correlated with lookalike domain registrations, external phishing URLs, and historical attack patterns from the same threat actor infrastructure.
The threat feed aggregates signals from DMARC forensic reports, lookalike domain registrations, phishing URL databases, and SMTP trap networks — correlating them into actionable threat events with severity scoring and recommended responses.
Not all domain abuse looks the same. Attackers use different techniques depending on whether they have DMARC to contend with, how targeted the attack is, and whether they prioritise volume or evasion. Migomail monitors for all four.
This is a reconstructed timeline of a real attack campaign targeting a Migomail customer in 2024. Email Threat Intelligence detected the lookalike domain 11 hours before the first phishing email was sent — providing the window to take defensive action before any customers were targeted.
For every organisation that has experienced a phishing campaign targeting their brand, the costs go far beyond the immediate incident. These are the documented downstream impacts on email programme performance and brand trust.
Migomail detected a lookalike domain (our brand name with -payments appended) 14 hours before the first phishing email was sent from it. That 14-hour window was enough for us to contact NameCheap abuse, get the domain suspended, and brief our finance team to ignore any emails coming from that domain. We also registered six defensive domain variants the same day. By the time the attackers were ready to start their campaign, their domain was already down. Without the early alert, we would have found out when customers started calling.
We had been at DMARC p=reject for 8 months and felt confident our domain was protected. Then Migomail flagged something we had never considered: our CFO was being impersonated via display name spoofing from a Gmail address. The emails said "Pooja Mehta, CFO" in the display name but the actual sender address was a Google account the attacker controlled. DMARC at p=reject is irrelevant for this attack — it does not involve our domain at all. The attacker was sending from Gmail to our vendors requesting urgent payment changes. Migomail detected the pattern through executive name monitoring in threat intelligence feeds and alerted us. We found 12 vendor contacts who had received these emails over 3 weeks. Three had responded. One had already updated bank details in their system before the fraud team caught it. The early alert from Migomail meant we were able to contain it before money moved. Without the alert, we would never have known until a vendor called about a missing payment.
The weekly threat digest has become a regular input to our board security report. Before Migomail, we had no visibility into how our brand was being used by attackers. We were essentially flying blind on everything that happened outside our own email infrastructure. The digest gives us a clear picture every week: how many new lookalike domains were registered, whether any phishing pages using our brand are currently active, and what our threat trend looks like compared to the previous quarter. Our board now understands the external threat landscape for our email domain in a way they never did before. That visibility has been as valuable as the alerts themselves.
"Switching to Migomail cut our email costs by 40% and our inbox placement jumped to 98.7%. The onboarding team set up DKIM, SPF, and DMARC in a single call — and our campaigns have been running flawlessly ever since."
Rahul Menon
Head of Growth, SaaS Platform — IndiaCommon questions about Email Threat Intelligence and domain abuse monitoring.
DMARC is a technical standard that controls what happens to emails sent using your domain — it rejects or quarantines unauthenticated emails. Email Threat Intelligence is a monitoring service that watches the wider email ecosystem for attacks involving your brand — including attacks that DMARC cannot stop, such as lookalike domain registrations, display name spoofing from different domains, and phishing pages impersonating your login portal. DMARC protects your domain. Email Threat Intelligence protects your brand.
No. DMARC at p=reject prevents emails from being sent using your exact domain without authentication — that is its scope. It does nothing to prevent: (1) emails sent from lookalike domains (yourbrand-secure.com is a different domain), (2) display name spoofing where your executive names are used from a Gmail or Outlook address, or (3) phishing websites that impersonate your login page. These three attack vectors account for the majority of brand-impersonation fraud and require dedicated threat intelligence monitoring.
A lookalike domain is a domain name that visually resembles yours — yourbrand-secure.com, yourbr4nd.com (with a number replacing a letter), yourbrand.net (different TLD), or yourbrandmail.com (with a word appended). Attackers register these to send phishing email that bypasses your DMARC because it is a different domain. Migomail scans new domain registrations globally using typosquatting algorithms and permutation scanning — most lookalike domains are detected within 6–12 hours of registration, often before the attacker configures email sending infrastructure.
Display name spoofing occurs when an attacker puts your CEO's name in the email display name field but sends from a completely different address — for example, "John Smith, CEO" appearing in the inbox but the actual sending address being johnsmithceo@gmail.com. Recipients who only see the display name (common on mobile) are deceived into thinking the email is from your CEO. There is no technical standard that prevents this — it cannot be stopped by DMARC, SPF, or DKIM because those standards apply to the sending domain (gmail.com in this case, which is legitimately authenticated). The only defence is monitoring for your executive names appearing in threat feeds and alerting.
Migomail provides: (1) Registrar abuse report templates pre-filled with the detected domain details, including the specific registrar and their abuse contact information; (2) Hosting provider abuse contact database for phishing page takedown requests; (3) Pre-formatted reports for phishing databases (PhishTank, SURBL, Google Safe Browsing) to accelerate browser warning activation; (4) ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) reporting coordination where relevant. Takedown timelines vary by registrar — NameCheap and GoDaddy typically act within 4–8 hours; some registrars take 24–48 hours.
Migomail maintains a registry of your executive names (CEO, CFO, CISO, etc.) and monitors external threat intelligence feeds for these names appearing in suspicious sender display name patterns. This includes direct threat feeds from email security providers, incident reports shared through ISACs, and analysis of DMARC forensic reports from your own domain that may show attackers testing different display name formats. When an executive name pattern is detected in a threat context, an alert fires with the source address and known targeting pattern.
Yes — Email Threat Intelligence is a standalone service. However, the combination of Hosted DMARC and Email Threat Intelligence provides substantially more comprehensive coverage. Hosted DMARC generates forensic reports (RUF) that feed directly into the threat intelligence layer, providing ground-truth data on exact-domain spoofing that supplements the external intelligence feeds. Standalone Email Threat Intelligence still covers lookalike domains, display name spoofing, and phishing pages — but does not have per-email forensic data on exact-domain spoofing without the DMARC forensic report integration.